Indian National Movement (Moderate Phase)

Indian National Movement (Moderate Phase)

Overview

The Moderate Phase (1885–1905) marks the formal beginning of organised nationalist politics in India. The Indian National Congress (INC), founded in 1885, became the principal vehicle for articulating Indian demands to the British government. This period is crucial for UPSC Prelims because questions frequently test the methods, leaders, achievements and limitations of the Moderates, as well as the circumstances that led to the rise of Extremism.

The Moderates believed in constitutional methods—petitions, prayers, resolutions and appeals to British conscience. They operated under the assumption that British rule could be reformed from within. While critics later called them "political mendicants," their contribution in creating national consciousness, training a generation of leaders and exposing the economic drain cannot be underestimated. Understanding the transition from Moderate to Extremist politics—culminating in the Surat Split (1907)—is essential for grasping the subsequent Gandhian phase.

Key Concepts

• Foundation of INC (1885): The first session was held in Bombay (December 1885) under W.C. Bonnerjee's presidency. A.O. Hume, a retired British civil servant, played a key organisational role. 72 delegates attended.
• Safety Valve Theory: A controversial interpretation suggesting the INC was founded to provide a safe outlet for educated Indian discontent and prevent another 1857-type uprising. Historians now consider this an oversimplification.
• Moderate Methods: Prayer, petition, persuasion; annual Congress sessions passing resolutions; sending delegations to England; using press and platform for propaganda; faith in British justice and gradual reform.
• Three Main Demands: (1) Expansion of Legislative Councils with elected Indian members, (2) Indianisation of civil services (simultaneous ICS exams in India and England), (3) Reduction of military expenditure and home charges.
• Economic Critique: Dadabhai Naoroji's "Drain Theory" (articulated in Poverty and Un-British Rule in India) exposed how wealth was being systematically transferred from India to Britain—a foundational argument that radicalised later generations.
• Partition of Bengal (1905): Lord Curzon partitioned Bengal on 16 October 1905, ostensibly for administrative efficiency, but with the clear aim of dividing Hindu-majority West Bengal from Muslim-majority East Bengal to weaken nationalism. This became the catalyst for Swadeshi and Boycott movements.
• Swadeshi and Boycott (1905–1908): Mass movements rejecting British goods and promoting indigenous products; marked a shift from elite politics to popular mobilisation; strongest in Bengal, Punjab and Maharashtra.
• Rise of Extremism: Leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak (Maharashtra), Bipin Chandra Pal (Bengal) and Lala Lajpat Rai (Punjab)—the "Lal-Bal-Pal" trio—advocated self-reliance (Swaraj), direct action and mass agitation rather than appeals to British goodwill.

Key Facts

Major Moderate Leaders: Dadabhai Naoroji, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, Pherozeshah Mehta, Surendranath Banerjee, Badruddin Tyabji, W.C. Bonnerjee, Madan Mohan Malaviya (initially).

Key Journals/Newspapers: The Hindu (G. Subramania Iyer), Amrita Bazar Patrika, Kesari and Maratha (Tilak—though he was Extremist).

Worked Examples

Example 1: Identifying Moderate vs Extremist

Question: Which of the following was NOT a characteristic of the Moderate phase of the national movement? (a) Faith in British sense of justice (b) Boycott of British goods as primary strategy (c) Demands through constitutional means (d) Focus on educated middle-class participation

Answer: (b). Boycott became a mass strategy only during the Swadeshi movement (1905 onwards), which was led primarily by Extremists. Moderates relied on petitions and resolutions.

---

Example 2: Associating Leaders with Contributions

Question: Match the following:

1. Dadabhai Naoroji — (A) President of INC thrice; economic nationalist
2. Gopal Krishna Gokhale — (B) Called "political Guru" by Gandhi
3. Surendranath Banerjee — (C) Founded Indian Association (1876); "Surrender Not"

Answer: 1-A, 2-B, 3-C.

---

Example 3: Sequence of Events

Question: Arrange chronologically: (i) Surat Split (ii) Partition of Bengal (iii) Foundation of INC (iv) Lucknow Pact

Answer: (iii) 1885 → (ii) 1905 → (i) 1907 → (iv) 1916.

Common Mistakes

• Confusing founders: Candidates assume A.O. Hume founded INC single-handedly. Correct: He was the chief organiser, but Indian leaders like W.C. Bonnerjee, Dadabhai Naoroji and others were equal co-founders.
• Treating Moderates as failures: Wrong thinking—"Moderates achieved nothing." Correct—They built organisational infrastructure, articulated economic critique, and nurtured leaders who later led radical movements.
• Mixing up Partition dates: Bengal was partitioned in 1905 and annulled in 1911—not 1947 (which was India's partition). The 1905 partition was reversed due to Swadeshi pressure.
• Attributing Swadeshi solely to Moderates: The Swadeshi movement was largely driven by Extremists, though some Moderates supported it in limited form.
• Assuming Surat Split was permanent: The Congress reunited at the Lucknow Session (1916) through efforts of Annie Besant and the Congress-Muslim League Pact.

Quick Reference

• INC founded: 1885, Bombay, President—W.C. Bonnerjee
• Moderate method: Petition, Prayer, Persuasion (3 Ps)
• Drain Theory: Dadabhai Naoroji
• Partition of Bengal: 1905 (Curzon); annulled 1911
• Lal-Bal-Pal: Lajpat Rai, Tilak, Bipin Pal—Extremist trio
• Surat Split: 1907—Moderates vs Extremists over methods and goals