WB Police PC · Reasoning & Logical Analysis
Logical conclusions from premises.
Study notes are still being prepared.
Don't wait — Shishya can teach you this topic right now, on demand.
Ask Shishya to teach this →Shishya is your personal tutor for this topic. Pick a starter or open a free chat.
Q1 · Syllogism · MEDIUM
Statements: 1. All policemen are honest. 2. Some honest persons are brave. Conclusions: I. Some policemen are brave. II. All brave persons are policemen. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements?
Q2 · Syllogism · EASY
Statements: 1. All books are papers. 2. All papers are sheets. Conclusions: I. All books are sheets. II. Some sheets are books. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements?
Q3 · Syllogism · MEDIUM
Statements: 1. No teacher is a doctor. 2. All doctors are engineers. Conclusions: I. No teacher is an engineer. II. Some engineers are not teachers. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements?
Q4 · Syllogism · HARD
Statements: 1. Some officers are graduates. 2. All graduates are educated. 3. No educated person is poor. Conclusions: I. Some officers are not poor. II. All officers are educated. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements?
Q5 · Syllogism · MEDIUM
Statements: All constables are officers. Some officers are inspectors. Conclusions: I. Some inspectors are constables. II. All inspectors are constables.