TN Police PC · Psychology / Mental Ability
Statement-conclusion, assumption and argument analysis.
Study notes are still being prepared.
Don't wait — Shishya can teach you this topic right now, on demand.
Ask Shishya to teach this →Shishya is your personal tutor for this topic. Pick a starter or open a free chat.
Q1 · Logical Reasoning · MEDIUM
Statement: All police officers are trained in law. Some trained people are judges. Conclusion I: Some judges are police officers. Conclusion II: All trained people in law are police officers. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statement?
Q2 · Logical Reasoning · EASY
Statement: The government has decided to increase the number of patrol vehicles in the city to reduce crime rates. Assumption I: More patrol vehicles will help in better surveillance. Assumption II: Crime rates are currently high in the city. Which assumption(s) is/are implicit in the statement?
Q3 · Logical Reasoning · MEDIUM
Statement: Should the retirement age for government employees be increased from 60 to 62 years? Argument I: Yes, it will help retain experienced employees and reduce pension burden in the short term. Argument II: No, it will reduce employment opportunities for young graduates. Which argument(s) is/are strong?
Q4 · Logical Reasoning · HARD
Statement: In a recent survey, 80% of citizens reported that they feel safer when police officers patrol their neighborhoods regularly. Conclusion I: Regular police patrolling increases the actual safety of neighborhoods. Conclusion II: Citizens perceive regular police presence as a factor that enhances their sense of security. Which conclusion(s) can be drawn from the statement?
Q5 · Logical Reasoning · MEDIUM
Statement: All officers are diligent. Some diligent people are honest. Conclusion I: All officers are honest. Conclusion II: Some honest people are officers. Which conclusion logically follows?