Inequalities
Overview
Inequalities is one of the most scoring and time-efficient topics in SBI Clerk Prelims Reasoning section. Questions test your ability to interpret relationship symbols (>, <, =, ≥, ≤) between elements and derive valid conclusions.
This topic comes in two forms: Direct Inequalities (symbols given as-is) and Coded Inequalities (symbols replaced by codes like @, #, $, %). Mastering the logical chain rules and recognizing invalid combinations is the key to accuracy. Since there's no calculation involved, this is pure logic — ideal for quick marks.
Key Concepts
- Basic Symbols: > means "greater than", < means "less than", = means "equal to", ≥ means "greater than or equal to", ≤ means "less than or equal to".
- Definite vs. Indefinite Relationships: A conclusion is definite only when all connecting symbols point in the same direction (all left-pointing or all right-pointing). Mixed directions yield no definite relationship.
- Chain Rule: You can combine relationships only when elements share a common link. For A > B ≤ C, the relationship between A and C is indefinite because > and ≤ conflict.
- Either-Or Conclusions: When two conclusions are individually false but together cover all possibilities (one uses > and other uses =, or one uses < and other uses =), "either-or" applies.
- Priority of Definite Symbol: In a chain, the weakest link determines the final relationship. If any link includes "=" along with >, the combined result becomes ≥.
- Complementary Pairs: > and ≤ are complementary (opposite). Similarly, < and ≥ are complementary. A relationship must be one or the other.
- Coded Inequality Decoding: Always write out the code key first. Convert coded statements to standard symbols before analyzing.
Formulas / Key Facts
| Combination | Result | Definite? |
|---|---|---|
| > with > | > | Yes |
| < with < | < | Yes |
| > with ≥ | > | Yes |
| < with ≤ | < | Yes |
| ≥ with ≥ | ≥ | Yes |
| ≤ with ≤ | ≤ | Yes |
| > with = | > | Yes |
| < with = | < | Yes |
| ≥ with = | ≥ | Yes |
| > with < | — | No (opposite directions) |
| ≥ with ≤ | — | No (unless both equal) |
| > with ≤ | — | No |
Must-Remember Rules:
- Same direction symbols → Definite conclusion possible
- Opposite direction symbols → No definite conclusion
- "Either-or" applies when both individual conclusions are false but are complementary
- Always trace the chain from the first element to the last element mentioned in the conclusion
- For coded inequalities, decode ALL symbols before attempting any question
Worked Examples
Example 1: Direct Inequality
Statement: P > Q ≥ R = S < T
Conclusions: I. P > S II. T > Q
Solution:
For I (P > S): Trace P → Q → R → S P > Q ≥ R = S All symbols point in the same direction (left to right: P is greater) P > Q ≥ R = S → P > S is TRUE
For II (T > Q): Trace T → S → R → Q T > S = R ≤ Q From T's perspective: T > S = R, then R ≤ Q Directions conflict (> then ≤) → T > Q is NOT DEFINITE
Answer: Only conclusion I follows.
Example 2: Coded Inequality
Code: @ means >, # means <, $ means =, % means ≥, & means ≤
Statement: A @ B $ C # D % E
Decode first: A > B = C < D ≥ E
Conclusions: I. A > C II. E < B
Solution:
For I (A > C): A > B = C → A > C is TRUE
For II (E < B): Trace E → D → C → B E ≤ D > C = B Directions: ≤ then > then = → Mixed directions E < B is NOT DEFINITE
Answer: Only conclusion I follows.
Example 3: Either-Or Case
Statement: M ≥ N = O ≤ P
Conclusions: I. M > P II. M = P
Solution:
Trace M → N → O → P: M ≥ N = O ≤ P Directions: ≥ then = then ≤ → Opposite directions (≥ vs ≤)
M > P → Not definite (FALSE) M = P → Not definite (FALSE)
But together, M ≥ P or M ≤ P must be true. Since we have M ≥ N = O and O ≤ P, the only certainty is M could be >, =, or < compared to P.
Wait — let's check: These conclusions are M > P and M = P. Together they make M ≥ P. But the chain doesn't guarantee M ≥ P.
Either-or does NOT apply here because M could also be < P.
Answer: Neither conclusion follows.
Common Mistakes
- Ignoring direction conflicts → Students assume A > B < C means A > C. Fix: Check if all symbols point the same way; opposite symbols = no conclusion.
- Confusing ≥ and > → Writing "A > B" when chain shows "A ≥ B". Fix: If any link has "=", the combined result includes "=" possibility.
- Applying either-or incorrectly → Using either-or when conclusions aren't complementary. Fix: Either-or only works when one conclusion is ">" and other is "=" for the same pair, or "<" and "=".
- Decoding errors in coded inequalities → Misremembering which symbol means what. Fix: Write the code key on rough sheet before solving. Never decode mentally.
- Reversing the chain direction → Checking Q > P when asked about P > Q. Fix: Always trace FROM the first element TO the second element as written in the conclusion.
Quick Reference
- Same direction symbols = Definite conclusion possible
- Opposite/mixed directions = No definite relationship
- Either-or = Both false individually + complementary pair
- Decode first, solve later (for coded inequalities)
- ≥ combines with ≥, >, or = to stay definite; breaks with < or ≤
- Trace conclusion elements in exact order given