HR Police PC · General Reasoning and Mental Aptitude
Two-statement deductions using all/some/no quantifiers.
Study notes are still being prepared.
Don't wait — Shishya can teach you this topic right now, on demand.
Ask Shishya to teach this →Shishya is your personal tutor for this topic. Pick a starter or open a free chat.
Q1 · Syllogism · EASY
Statements: 1. All books are pens. 2. All pens are pencils. Conclusions: I. All books are pencils. II. Some pencils are books. Which conclusion logically follows?
Q2 · Syllogism · MEDIUM
Statements: 1. Some doctors are engineers. 2. No engineer is a teacher. Conclusions: I. Some doctors are not teachers. II. No doctor is a teacher. Which conclusion logically follows?
Q3 · Syllogism · MEDIUM
Statements: 1. All mobiles are computers. 2. Some computers are laptops. Conclusions: I. Some mobiles are laptops. II. Some laptops are mobiles. Which conclusion logically follows?
Q4 · Syllogism · HARD
Statements: 1. No policeman is a criminal. 2. All criminals are liars. 3. Some liars are corrupt. Conclusions: I. No policeman is a liar. II. Some corrupt persons are criminals. Which conclusion logically follows?
Q5 · Syllogism · MEDIUM
Statements: All pens are books. Some books are tables. Conclusions: I. Some pens are tables. II. All tables are books. Which conclusion logically follows?