Kohlberg — Moral Development

Kohlberg — Moral Development

Overview

Lawrence Kohlberg's theory of moral development is a cornerstone topic in Child Development and Pedagogy for TS TET. It explains how children (and adults) progress through distinct stages in their ability to reason about right and wrong. Unlike rote learning of rules, Kohlberg focused on how people think about moral dilemmas, not just what they decide.

For TS TET, you must know the three levels, six stages, and their classroom implications. Questions typically test stage identification from scenarios, age-appropriateness of stages, and how teachers can foster moral reasoning. This theory builds on Piaget's earlier work on moral development but extends it through adolescence and adulthood, making it especially relevant for Paper II (classes 6–8).

Understanding Kohlberg helps teachers recognise why students at different ages respond differently to rules, fairness, and ethical situations—essential knowledge for creating a morally supportive classroom environment.

Key Concepts

• Moral reasoning develops in stages: Children move through fixed, universal stages in the same order; no stage can be skipped, though individuals may stop at any stage.
• Three levels, six stages: Kohlberg organised moral development into Pre-conventional (stages 1–2), Conventional (stages 3–4), and Post-conventional (stages 5–6) levels.
• Focus on reasoning, not behaviour: Kohlberg assessed moral development based on the justification for decisions, not the decision itself. Two people can make the same choice for very different moral reasons.
• Moral dilemmas as assessment tools: Kohlberg used hypothetical dilemmas (most famously the Heinz dilemma) to probe how individuals reason about conflicting moral claims.
• Age-stage correspondence: Pre-conventional reasoning dominates in early childhood (up to age 9), conventional reasoning emerges in adolescence, and post-conventional reasoning (if reached) appears in adulthood.
• Cognitive development is necessary but not sufficient: Higher moral reasoning requires advanced cognitive abilities (linked to Piaget), but cognitive growth alone does not guarantee moral growth.
• Role-taking opportunities promote growth: Exposure to higher-stage reasoning and opportunities to consider others' perspectives help individuals advance through stages.

Key Facts

Must-remember facts:

• Kohlberg based his research on responses to the Heinz dilemma (Should Heinz steal a drug to save his dying wife?).
• Most adolescents and adults operate at Stage 3 or 4 (Conventional level).
• Stage 6 is rare; even Kohlberg later questioned whether it could be empirically verified.
• Kohlberg was influenced by Piaget's stages of moral development (heteronomous vs. autonomous morality).
• Carol Gilligan criticised Kohlberg's theory for gender bias, arguing it undervalued care-based reasoning more common in women.
• Moral development can be stimulated through moral dilemma discussions in classrooms.

Worked Examples

Example 1: Stage Identification

Scenario: A student says, "I won't copy in the exam because if I get caught, the teacher will punish me."

Analysis: The reasoning is based on avoiding punishment, not on understanding why cheating is wrong. This reflects Stage 1 (Punishment-Obedience) reasoning.

---

Example 2: Same Action, Different Stages

Scenario: Two students refuse to cheat. Student A says, "My friends would think badly of me." Student B says, "Cheating is against school rules that everyone must follow."

Analysis:

• Student A reasons based on peer approval → Stage 3 (Good Boy-Nice Girl)
• Student B reasons based on maintaining rules and order → Stage 4 (Law and Order)

Both made the same moral choice, but their reasoning places them at different stages.

---

Example 3: Classroom Application

Scenario: A teacher presents a dilemma: "You find a wallet with money. No one is watching. What do you do and why?"

Teaching implication: By asking "why," the teacher assesses the level of moral reasoning. A student saying "I'd return it because stealing is a crime" (Stage 4) shows different moral growth than one saying "I'd return it because the owner might really need it, and I'd want someone to do the same for me" (Stage 5 reasoning emerging).

Common Mistakes

• Confusing stage with age: Students assume all 10-year-olds are at Stage 2 or all adults reach Stage 5. → Fix: Stages are sequential but not age-locked. Many adults never progress beyond Stage 4.
• Judging by the decision, not the reasoning: Marking a response correct because the student chose "the right action." → Fix: Kohlberg's model evaluates the justification. Two opposite decisions can reflect the same stage if the reasoning is similar.
• Treating Stage 6 as common: Assuming post-conventional reasoning is typical in adolescents. → Fix: Most adolescents operate at Conventional level (Stages 3–4). Stage 5–6 is rare and mostly seen in adulthood, if at all.
• Ignoring cultural and gender critiques: Accepting the theory as universally valid without noting criticisms. → Fix: Remember Gilligan's critique that Kohlberg's model may undervalue care-oriented reasoning and was developed primarily from male samples.
• Mixing up Stages 3 and 4: Both are Conventional, but Stage 3 is about interpersonal approval while Stage 4 is about societal rules. → Fix: Stage 3 = "What will people think of me?" Stage 4 = "What do the rules say?"

Quick Reference

1. Three levels: Pre-conventional → Conventional → Post-conventional
2. Six stages: Punishment-Obedience → Instrumental → Good Boy-Nice Girl → Law and Order → Social Contract → Universal Principles
3. Heinz dilemma: Kohlberg's famous tool—focus on why the answer, not what the answer
4. Most people reach Stage 3–4; Stage 6 is rare and theoretical
5. Classroom tip: Use moral dilemma discussions to promote higher-stage reasoning
6. Key criticism: Gilligan argued the theory has gender bias—undervalues ethics of care